Thursday, 17 March 2011
filming 2
Wednesday, 16 March 2011
Evaluation Question 1
Evaluation Question 1 - In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?
Performance music videos pre-date the 1980s. Before MTV, performance music videos were exactly as the term suggested, music performances captured on video. These were used solely as promotion and often called "the promo clips." The rise of MTV started a creative fervor to explore the medium further. Armond White in a New York Press article wrote "The popularity of music video derived from the new thrill of putting imagery to music, the surprise of making graphics out of the beat."
Our music video uses a variety of music video conventions throughout, which is what we were aiming to do with our task, but also challenges any of them along with the production of it aswell.
Performance videos Are mostly used by bands.This type of video is used for bands because this makes the viewer absorbed in the energy of the performance.Our group decided this was the best type of video to create , firstly because as a consumer we enjoy watching these types of music videos and secondly we believed we could create an authentic performance videos by using the conventions of a music video.The group at first was thinking of maybe using a narrative for the video but we all agreed the style and genre of the band was best suited a video focuses on them performing.
To make the video realistic to our target viewer we had to use the conventions of a performance video such as
- Quick cuts
- A variety of camera shots
- A combination of camera angles used
- A well lit set
- The correct camera movement
Firstly we used a lot of the usual conventions of media products by using a lot of the ordinary, basic shots that can be found in many famous music videos, this makes the music video easily viewable for our audience and easily accessible.The shots we aimed (and succeeded) in using the singers face shot, this seems to hold some importance as it lets the audience quickly develop an unspoken connection with the singer in the video, as if he (the singer) is singing to the audience himself, it also identifies them to the audience letting them know who it is, and making it easily recognizable for later on,a very usual convention of music videos. The shots in the video use are mainly close ups , focusing on the performers eyes , mouth and face to connect the emotion of the performance between the audience and the band.This is also to make sure that the viewer can identify who the lead singer is in the band.
In our video we have a lot of guitar solos , so Alex ,Sarah and I thought i was necessary to put close ups of the solos in the video so that when the viewer watches the video they need to know where the sounds are coming from.The close ups were used to see finger work and to get the viewer involved with the song and beat.In a performance video close ups of different parts of the drum are used to give the sense of rhythm to the viewer.
I feel the group and I have successfully utilized typical conventions in media through our shot choices, using classic and recognizable methods of shooting our band for example switching between the instruments and vocals.The Editing was synchronized with the pace of the music which matches the convention of a performance video giving the viewer a video easy on the eye to watch.
above you can see the drummer in the foo fighters video "pretender" and the one in ours, the shots and camera movements are exactly the same.Music videos give a voyeur impression on the viewer so i believe our video looks professional because our camera movement makes the viewer seem like they are there on the stage with the group.The combination of shots and angles makes the video look professional just like a real media product, below is more comparisons on conventional shots in a performance video which we have used.
Tuesday, 15 March 2011
Monday, 14 March 2011
Filming 3
The final time we filmed was the first time we all filmed together, this proved very usual hence why the footage was good enough because we communicated well and worked good as a team.We would swap with each other on filming so that each member of the group participated in the filming.While one person filmed the other two would talk about the next shots to film making the filming process run very smoothly.
Filming 1
Pitch 1
Band photos
Another problem was the band itself , they were easily distracted and were not good at taking instruction .As you can see 3 of them are looking different ways and only the guy on the left listened to instruction to look at the camera .So if we had people who were good to work with the task would of been a lot easier .
Monday, 7 March 2011
Evalution question 3
What have you learned from your audience feedback ?
Audience Feedback from Sarah Chamberlain on Vimeo.
The first bit of feedback we got was from our rough cut, the class had a screening and wrote down their opinions.We got good strong feedback on how the video could be improved such as
- Quick cuts
- Guitar solo out of syn
-More obvious when guitar is playing solo
After receiving the criticism for the rough cut we used facebook to get feed back to see if improvement was made and whether our final cut was good enough.Facebook was the best way to get feedback because our target market was our age group and my friends on the website were in that age group.The comment we got was really positive meaning our final product was good enough for out audience.
The comments overall were great telling us that no more work was reqjjjjjuired to make this a successful video .
I am happy with the way we used the feedback to get to our finished result looking at the rough cut to the final cut , i can happily say the feedback helped us make the end product more cleaner in places and made it look much more professional.
Tuesday, 1 March 2011
Evaluation question 4
How did you use the media technologies in the construction and research, planning and evaluation stages?
Right from the start of the year when we found out about what our project was for our A2 coursework we have used many different media technologies to prepare ourselves for it as well as when we were constructing the coursework. The very first thing that we did was to design our header for our media blog. This was done using the program photoshop. This program wasn't new to us because we used it for our year 12 coursework so we just had to remind ourselves of how to use the program. The program photoshop became very important throughout the whole project as it was needed to edit photos that we wanted to use for our Digipack and pictures for our website.
The big help definitely came in the construction stages of our work.Without the aid of tools like Final Cut being able to edit down our video, it would be very difficult to piece together seperate pieces of footage and be extremely time consuming on the day of filming, and thusly by using programmes like Final Cut it made the process significantly easier.At the end of year 12 Mrs Mcluckie gaves us time to practice making a video and editing it , this was a big help to me but i still struggled.Luckily Alex was a quick learner on using final cut , so he was the main person in the group editing the video ,with Sarah and I giving him ideas on the construction of the video.The editing of the video was the longest process because while editing the video the group as a whole was still learning for example we learnt towards the end how to do colour correction to make the video look more professional.
Another technology we used throughout the project was the Internet using firefox. This was a major part of our planning stage as we had to research things such as, costumes and ideas for our video, settings for our video, also different fonts we could use for our Digipack and Website.Below is a link to the website Dafont which became very helpful to me and my group throughout the project. This gave us a variety and choice when it came to Designing our ancillary tasks.
http://www.dafont.com/
To help us in the research for target audience Uk Tribes was used.This website gives you information on trends, behavior and general likes/dislikes of different groups of people.UK Tribes was born in 2005, when Channel 4 commissioned crowd DNA (then called Ramp Industry) to run a project called TV Glue, which looked to measure how TV could remain a unifying force in the midst of media fragmentation.
For our research the internet sites like youtube and vimeo helped us to analyze music videos and see what conventions music videos have.
The camera we used to film the music video was a Sony DCR-HC62 .This camera was ideal for us to use because it was easy to move round the stage and because we was making a performance video it easy to hold since we wanted natural camera movement for the video.The picture quality could of been better but this is due to the camera being out dated , the negatives in technology is it is always updating .
The last bit of important equipment was the Mac computers in the classroom.As a student i realized i was lucky to use these computer for course work because they are the best media based computers.Final cut can only be used on a mac based platform meaning, if these computers were not in our possession we could end up having to use a cheaper less quality software to produce our coursework.
Wednesday, 16 February 2011
Tuesday, 15 February 2011
Album cover research
Originally for the digipak front cover , the idea was to use pictures of the band on the front cover , but after researching the band digipaks we noticed that they dont require the actual band on them .The majority use symbolism, logos or different concepts so after realizing this we chose to design an album which has a concept .
Sunday, 6 February 2011
Band names
Revolt
Revolution
Rampage
Rage
Destruction
Disturbance
Deranged
Animatic process
Animatic
Animatic from Sarah Chamberlain on Vimeo.
Music Video Feedback
short frames?
quicker cuts?
overall-good
Tuesday, 25 January 2011
locations
The 3rd location was a hall in Eltham which Sarah rented out and filmed at .The place was cheap to rent but the problem was when looking at the footage the lighting was wrong and it just didn't fit the song.
The final location choice was a pub in Gravesend called The Red Lion , this place i believe was the best place to film because we had lights already installed and we had a fully functional stage to use for our video.The best part about this location was the fact it was cheap to hire compared to the first two ideas (Resident studios and a car park ) and it has the best band performance facilities.